With all the talk about refugees as of late, and how many on both the right and the left are trying to make this a political issue and about shaping the kind of country we ought to be and the people we ought to admit, there is one example of a very well known terrorist who has been making a joke out of our refugee appeals process for over twenty years: Mahmoud Mohammad Issa Mohammed.
Even though we know for a fact he hijacked an El-Al plane in Greece, an incident that led to the death of an Israeli mechanic and got a lengthy sentence (commuted due to a prisoner swap / blackmail), he roamed between several Arab countries and eventually managed to get into Canada in 1987. When it became obvious who he was -- it was shown that he did not disclose his affiliation with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, he was ordered deported. In 1988. He's still here.
He has used the standard canard that he was not a terrorist but a "freedom fighter" (like the Provisional IRA) and that he was fighting his enemy, Israel, "the enemy of his people." [his words, not mine] He also says that if he was sent back to the last country where he apparently came from, Lebanon, he would face almost certain death in a refugee camp -- and in any case, he has been an idea citizen, his daughters have established roots here and it would be a violation of his human rights to be deprived of citizenship due to an "oversight."
Frankly, I do not consider omitting a previous criminal conviction, especially a terrorist act (even if one was pardoned for it) to be an oversight. Further, the PFLP is a listed terrorist group by Canada, the US and the EU. It also backed away just a few months ago from endorsing a "two state solution" and has now gone to a "one state solution" which of course would mean the end of Israel as we know it.
While we grant asylum to people who have been convicted of crimes that would never be considered crimes here (such as advocating for a free press or proselytizing) there should be a no brainer on this one: MMIM is a menace to society. It doesn't matter he has a family here. We have a hard enough time hunting down terrorists and organized crime figures who were born here. We should not be sending a message that we welcome terrorists from foreign shores.
How many "pre-removal risk assessments" do we have to do to figure out the obvious? The last time I checked, a potential refugee is entitled to go through a Singh process once from application to final appeal once, not five or six times. MMIM has made a mockery out of habeas corpus -- the evidence against him is overwhelming and proven. Kick the bum out, now.
Vote for this post at Progressive Bloggers.
3 comments:
Or, how about we recognize he did the crime, did his time and as long as he keeps his nose clean leave him alone to get on with his life.
No Robert, I'd say we go with "at the very least you were a terrorist and we don't allow terrorists into this country" and kick him out immediately.
Refugee status is for refugees. Terrorists are not refugees. Cases like this are why our refugee system is a bad joke.
Blast Furnace is completely right.
He crossed the line from freedom fighter to terrorist when he targeted innocent civilians. The fact that he lived freely in a number of nations before lying his way into Canada shows him not to be in need of refuge.
Post a Comment