Australia, Chile, New Zealand and Japan have fairly comparable human rights records and are well established democracies.
Peru can rightly be called a democracy, but it has faced an
insurgency from Maoists for as long as I can remember. Its human rights record - not the best, although better than many in this grouping.
Mexico has its huge drug problem. When just one city – Juarez – has 17,000 murders in just one year, but the neighboring city of El Paso has just three, you know there’s a crisis. Mexico too is a democracy, but still a fragile one.
Mexico has its huge drug problem. When just one city – Juarez – has 17,000 murders in just one year, but the neighboring city of El Paso has just three, you know there’s a crisis. Mexico too is a democracy, but still a fragile one.
Brunei and Vietnam have appalling human rights records. Especially on the rights of LGBTs.
Singapore doesn’t allow its press to criticize its foreign
policy – only those of other countries. Districts are gerrymandered to ensure
the ruling party always wins, although last time they got “just” 65% of seats,
compared to the usual 80 to 90. Plus, in what other country is it illegal to
chew gum without a license? Seriously.
Malaysia has a somewhat better human rights record, but far
from a sparkling one. Elections there tend to be rather suspect.
Gone is the concept of linkage - you get freer trade if you expand rights. I find that unacceptable.
I say no to this arrangement. With the top four countries, yes. Mexico and the US that's a done deal anyway. The others ... clean up your acts as well as your domestic security issues, then we can talk.
1 comment:
VERY INFORMATIVE ARTICLE. Thanks
www.cosmopolitanmechanical.ca
Post a Comment