Thursday, December 31, 2015

Should there be a referendum on PR?

The Conservatives are vowing to filibuster attempts by the governing Liberals to reform the way we elect our MPs - be it alternative vote or some kind of proportional representation, unless there is a referendum. Normally, changing the rules for representation only requires a vote of Parliament. But this just might require a constitutional amendment of the kind that requires the consent of at least seven provinces, especially if we're going to tinker with the idea of proportionality for the provinces.

Remember that several provinces are over represented thanks to a grandfather clause - if there were strict proportionality, Saskatchewan would have 10 members, Manitoba 12, New Brunswick 7, Prince Edward Island 2, Nova Scotia 9, Newfoundland-Labrador 5. Instead, they have 14, 14, 10, 4, 11 and 7, respectively. Will a new PR system require provinces get strictly what they're entitled to and no more?

Also, there is the issue of "overhang" seats. This commonly happens in Germany, when a party's percentage of the popular vote means it gets fewer seats than the number of constituencies they're entitled to by that vote - or vice versa. In such case, new seats are created out of fresh air and people on party lists who might not have been entitled to be elected, end up with seats.

What could that mean? Presume we stick with 338 seats, but after the votes are counted about 20 overhangs are created. Where to sit them?

You may have noticed a change in seating arrangements for this Parliament. The seats used to be two by two. To make room for the 30 new members this year, the seats had to be arranged so members now sit in blocks of five.

One could argue if we're going to have a referendum on this, then the entire constitution will have to be reopened. I don't think so. But I think there's a point here. In every country I'm aware of that has made the switch from FPTP to something else, voters were asked first. So, I think we should be here, too.

For myself ... If it's alternative vote, I'd go against. But if we went to something like STV or MMR ... that is something I could support. I'd prefer the latter because you could vote for a list (i.e. for PM) for one party and a local candidate from another.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

What a bunch of toads. This is exactly the kind of 'me first' politics that Canadians would like to see put to an end.

The new Canadian government has to find a way to starve out the Senators. Start with ending any financial latitude, make their lives miserable, investigate anyone who spend more than $1 on a coffee and push them out.

Bill Longstaff said...

A proportional representation system could be tailored to Canada's unique needs. If the Liberals propose such a system, there will be no need for a referendum. And with three parties that included electoral reform as key parts of their election platforms holding two-thirds of the seats in the House, a clear mandate for reform has already been established.

emma Stone said...

Canada is really a Beautiful country in the world. large number of tourist must visit that amazing place in the world. but local transportation is really a big issue because most of agency fraud with innocent people. so we provide Online solution of Travelling vehicle because Hamilton Airport limo is known very famous brand of in this industry.

Pritchett Stantham said...

I seriously have to understand what politics all around the Canada. Got to know a lot about politics in this blog.

Heating and Cooling Toronto

Jessie Ray said...

This article helps me understand politics. Such an amazing blog to look through politics.

Heating and Cooling Mississauga